3 ms·

Had to read that twice. Was pretty sure he meant "RakNet" the first time ;) Oh, and just gonna put this out there: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q

• e12e 12y ago
  Then again: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/compare.php?lang=racket&lang2=hipe http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/compare.php?lan... and Erlang is certainly a valid platform for servers, so as usual benchmarks are just benchmarks... would be interesting to see if typed racked made a difference in these tests -- although I'm not sure if performance is the main focus of typed racked (as opposed to just type safety).
  • igouy 12y ago
    http://www.erlang.org/faq/introduction.html#idp32166576 http://www.erlang.org/faq/introduction.html#idp32166576
• glogla 12y ago
  If you look at the graph, you'll see "possible mismatch - one-core program compared to multi-core program." there. And indeed, of the ten benchmarks, four of them are singlecore racket vs quadcore Go. Single core-comparison is much less dramatic, though Racket is still slower.
  • igouy 12y ago
    Well done!