4 ms·
Does the microscope care about probabilistic densities? Aren't these images rendering interference/difference between electrons sent out and electrons received?
by pistle 12y ago
Does the microscope care about probabilistic densities? Aren't these images rendering interference/difference between electrons sent out and electrons received?
Those 'particles' supposedly were in the space and interacted with the electron beams. They were or weren't in a place at a time.
In wave particle-duality, how are we not just suggesting particles are there because it creates an estimate model that helps model behaviors observed?
In the facetted nano-diamond void, why, in the void, do we see apparent 'ghosts' of the lattice in the void? Are there particles there or not? If there are, why are they dim?
- awgl 12y agoRight. Well, given your comment and niels_olson's, I feel I have misspoken about this STEM experiment. Not that was I said about quantum mechanics was wrong, just that its relevance to the measurement in this experiment is misguided. As niels_olson points out, the primary interaction here is between the electron beam and the atomic nuclei.
- Dylan16807 12y agoWhen you have enough samples, probabilities just become counts. I would assume at the void it's dimly picking up the atoms at the bottom.