You can draw a different lesson from the 20th century history. [...] generally speaking, when you look at the 20th century, it's the era of the masses, mass po

You can draw a different lesson from the 20th century history. [...] generally speaking, when you look at the 20th century, it's the era of the masses, mass politics, mass economics. Every human being has value, has political, economic, and military value, simply because he or she is a human being, and this goes back to the structures of the military and of the economy, where every human being is valuable as a soldier in the trenches and as a worker in the factory. But in the 21st century, there is a good chance that most humans will lose, they are losing, their military and economic value. This is true for the military, it's done, it's over. The age of the masses is over. We are no longer in the First World War, where you take millions of soldiers, give each one a rifle and have them run forward. And the same thing perhaps is happening in the economy. Maybe the biggest question of 21st century economics is what will be the need in the economy for most people in the year 2050. http://edge.org/conversation/yuval_noah_harari-daniel_kahneman-death-is-optional http://edge.org/conversation/yuval_noah_harari-daniel_kahnem...