3 ms·
Seems like my Macbook Air 2014 is not affected (with a high probability) here's the test: https://github.com/google/rowhammer-test https://github.com/google/ro
by aselzer 12y ago
Seems like my Macbook Air 2014 is not affected (with a high probability)
here's the test: https://github.com/google/rowhammer-test https://github.com/google/rowhammer-test
- jacquesm 12y agoHow long did you test it? The tests they did ran fairly long, possibly you'd have to run this for days to really be able to state that a particular machine/ram combination is not vulnerable.
- tux3 12y agoThanks for the link. I haven't seen anything after 375 iterations (600s). So I may still be exploitable, but that means you'd have to keep something running at 100% CPU for > 600s and somehow have me not notice the laptop fans going crazy.
- Dylan16807 12y agoAn exploit tool could always run slower and hide from that. Also consider that it might work better when your laptop is in lower power mode because of reduced voltages.
- thomasdullien 12y agoYou may wish to try both single- and double-sided hammering. If you hit the right row size it is significantly more effective: https://github.com/google/rowhammer-test/blob/master/double_sided_rowhammer.cc https://github.com/google/rowhammer-test/blob/master/double_...
- mintplant 12y ago> The test should work on Linux or Mac OS X, on x86 only. No x86_64 support?
- dmm 12y agoThey mean no powerpc or other non-intel chips. I've run it on several x86_64/amd64/x64 processors.