I apologize. I had skimmed the paper, but not read it in depth, and it was clear that you had considered symmetries (such as Figure 4 in the paper); I assumed,

I apologize. I had skimmed the paper, but not read it in depth, and it was clear that you had considered symmetries (such as Figure 4 in the paper); I assumed, then, that your algorithm would prune symmetries and simply account for them by multiplying the results in each class by the number of symmetries. I hadn't yet finished reading the paper, however.