5 ms·
Well, this whole situation just might be what makes him "notable" enough to have this wikipedia page. He is, after all, the only australian freelance journalis
by DaFranker 12y ago
Well, this whole situation just might be what makes him "notable" enough to have this wikipedia page.
He is, after all, the only australian freelance journalist whose essay on how his own wikipedia page bypassed the wikipedia notability filters spurred on a debate on his own notability. The delicious (and unique) recursive meta here is, IMO, more than enough to keep the page.
- swang 12y agoSeems like it would be bad to encourage people to do this by allowing the article to stay up.
- insertnickname 12y agoSpite should be a valid reason for deleting articles.
- JadeNB 12y ago> Spite should be a valid reason for deleting articles. Should not, right?
- spot 12y agoturns out that doesn't qualify: http://wikipediaart.org/ http://wikipediaart.org/
- Dylan16807 12y agoReading the timeline on that is pretty sad, and reflects badly on wikipedia. Controversial article gets speedy deleted against policy and there's no recourse.