4 ms·
It seems this is all based on a finding of "traces of wheat DNA" Does that really suggest farming or trade? Couldn't it have just been wild wheat?
by shawabawa3 12y ago
It seems this is all based on a finding of "traces of wheat DNA"
Does that really suggest farming or trade? Couldn't it have just been wild wheat?
- dalke 12y agoQuoting from the article: > The scientists also found DNA of oak, poplar and beech and of dogs or wolves, deer, grouse and auroch, a type of cow. There was no trace of wheat pollen in the samples, indicating that it was not grown locally.
- shawabawa3 12y agoOops, not sure how I missed that paragraph