3 ms·
I don't think OP is saying GA sucks; I think he's saying that you can't take the results that GA gives you as being to-the-numbers accurate. They're still direc
by exelius 12y ago
I don't think OP is saying GA sucks; I think he's saying that you can't take the results that GA gives you as being to-the-numbers accurate. They're still directionally accurate, and GA is so easy to implement that it gives you a lot of bang for relatively little effort.
Many people actually don't realize that GA does sampling, or the effect said sampling can have on their numbers.
- redredredred 12y agoExactly. Knowing its limitations, and being able to communicate them well to the people you need to convince to succeed in your job, is the right way to go. - Simon
- nl 12y agoPlease don't sign comments; they're already signed with your username. If other users want to learn more about you, they can click on it to see your profile. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- redredredred 12y agoThanks for the heads up. I'm quite new here :)