3 ms·
Weren't there some nasty DRM things put into HTTP 2.0? That's going back a while, but I thought there was something nefarious going on.
by harkyns_castle 12y ago
Weren't there some nasty DRM things put into HTTP 2.0? That's going back a while, but I thought there was something nefarious going on.
- halflings 12y agoWasn't that HTML5 [1]? I don't think there was any plan to implement DRM-capabilities in HTTP2. [1] http://www.infoworld.com/article/2612478/html5/berners-lee-and-w3c-approve-html5-video-drm-additions.html http://www.infoworld.com/article/2612478/html5/berners-lee-a...
- harkyns_castle 12y agoI'll have to read the spec I guess, but I think you're right. I just vaguely recall hearing some concerning stuff, maybe that was something else (SPYDY or whatever that was?). If TBL has ratified it I'm no one to argue.
- takeda 12y agoI think you're referring to HTML 5[1]. [1] https://w3c.github.io/encrypted-media/ https://w3c.github.io/encrypted-media/
- dragonwriter 12y agoNeither HTTP/2 nor SPDY have ever had any DRM provision.
- harkyns_castle 12y agoGood to hear, thanks. I'll dredge up what I was thinking of soon.