5 ms·

hahah, at least it's a good demonstration of the possibilities. Honestly I think the best personal use I will find is with my morning emails exchanges with a f

hahah, at least it's a good demonstration of the possibilities. Honestly I think the best personal use I will find is with my morning emails exchanges with a few friends on the east coast (about 25 emails go back and forth every morning, including links, videos, etc.). We just to do it with a blog but that didn't fit. Chat is too time consuming, but Wave might be just right. At least it'll make procrastinating more efficient.

joe_the_user 17y ago
Well, It could also be a demonstration of the limitations. The question with Wave is: will it live up to the hype and replace a wide swath of other communications protocols or will it just be one more protocol? Everything I'm hearing makes it seem like it will be the latter, which is fine, especially if you like D & D.
- gloob 17y ago
  will it live up to the hype and replace a wide swath of other communications protocols It's not like POP killed IRC, or HTTP killed SMTP. Different protocols do different things. What serious candidates would there be for Wave to kill?
  - MicahWedemeyer 17y ago
    Heresy! Techcrunch has taught us well that the only way for a new service/protocol/whatever to be born is by tearing its way free out the entrails of another, more mature, not-as-hot-right-now protocol. Sorry for the imagery, I just thought it fit with the D&D theme :)
  - roc 17y ago
    Some different protocols do different things. But XMPP, particularly wrapped in the Wave implementation, can do many, many things. Wave might catch on as little more than an open-source alternative to, say, Sharepoint and Biztalk. (collaboration and workflow automation being the most obvious non-communication uses). But I don't see why people would stop short and not replace their SMTP/Jabber/IRC/RSS use with Wave once they and everyone they need to work with is using it.
  - netcan 17y ago
    merging Skype and mail sounds good though. If Skype put out a mail client, I'd probably use it.

joe_the_user 17y ago

Well, It could also be a demonstration of the limitations. The question with Wave is: will it live up to the hype and replace a wide swath of other communications protocols or will it just be one more protocol? Everything I'm hearing makes it seem like it will be the latter, which is fine, especially if you like D & D.

gloob 17y ago
will it live up to the hype and replace a wide swath of other communications protocols It's not like POP killed IRC, or HTTP killed SMTP. Different protocols do different things. What serious candidates would there be for Wave to kill?
- MicahWedemeyer 17y ago
  Heresy! Techcrunch has taught us well that the only way for a new service/protocol/whatever to be born is by tearing its way free out the entrails of another, more mature, not-as-hot-right-now protocol. Sorry for the imagery, I just thought it fit with the D&D theme :)
- roc 17y ago
  Some different protocols do different things. But XMPP, particularly wrapped in the Wave implementation, can do many, many things. Wave might catch on as little more than an open-source alternative to, say, Sharepoint and Biztalk. (collaboration and workflow automation being the most obvious non-communication uses). But I don't see why people would stop short and not replace their SMTP/Jabber/IRC/RSS use with Wave once they and everyone they need to work with is using it.
- netcan 17y ago
  merging Skype and mail sounds good though. If Skype put out a mail client, I'd probably use it.