4 ms·
It is copyleft. In fact they leave you more rights to copy the source than GPL.
by Htsthbjig 12y ago
It is copyleft. In fact they leave you more rights to copy the source than GPL.
- tjr 12y agohttp://www.gnu.org/copyleft/ http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/
- hywel 12y agoFrom http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#license http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#license: "LLVM’s license is not a “copyleft” license like the GPL." Rights to copy the source is not what copyleft means.
- tree_of_item 12y agoNo it isn't copyleft, I'm not sure you know what "copyleft" means.
- marcosdumay 12y agoThe word "copyleft" has a meaning. Please, don't polute the discussion with missleading political speech trying to change its meaning.
- peatmoss 12y agoOpen source: yes Free/Libre software: yes (https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatib...) Copyleft: no