4 ms·
It's clear from the memo that the FCC considers security risks to be exempt from this requirement. It sounds like the AP being on your network is what constitu
by anextio 12y ago
It's clear from the memo that the FCC considers security risks to be exempt from this requirement.
It sounds like the AP being on your network is what constitutes the security risk. I doubt the FCC would have a problem with a network administrator taking action like that. Unrelated APs are different.
- dedward 12y agoIt's also arguably not "harmful interference"... it's a legitimate operation within your network.
- eli 12y agoYeah, big difference between limiting access to your own network and limiting access to someone else's
- konceptz 12y agoThe link escapes me now but isn't this what Marriott is claiming?
- spacecowboy_lon 12y agothers a diference between a rogue ap atached to your DS (distribution system) and a rogue client device.