5 ms·
Since most ads are effectively blocked at the domain level, I doubt your scheme would provide much bang for the buck.
by wampus 12y ago
Since most ads are effectively blocked at the domain level, I doubt your scheme would provide much bang for the buck.
- fpgaminer 12y agoThe idea is that the ads would be served from the original host. Combined with encrypted URIs and the ad resources become indistinguishable from content resources. Thus thwarting blocking. As others have pointed out, yes this evil trick is incompatible with existing ad networks (which use their own domains). But it wasn't my intention to put forward a viable idea. Just an interesting one (namely, ciphering URIs to prevent blocking).