3 ms·
So that means you're also against smoking and drinking...? Not trying to be snarky - but there are LOTS of activities that are socially acceptable that endange
by DougN7 12y ago
So that means you're also against smoking and drinking...? Not trying to be snarky - but there are LOTS of activities that are socially acceptable that endanger others. And they are probably a whole lot more dangerous overall than lack of vaccination. (For the record, my children and I are vaccinated).
- alphakappa 12y agoSmoking and drinking do not necessarily endanger others. You can smoke by yourself, or drink without driving etc. Vaccination is not the same, unless you intend to quarantine your kids forever.
- MBCook 12y agoSmoking and drinking aren't highly contagious and usually don't kill in days/weeks.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- mjevans 12y agoI choose not to smoke or drink my self. What others decide to do to themselves within a safe context that does not endanger my self or others is the business of the consenting adults involved as long as it is only them involved. I fully support legalizing, regulating, and taxing everything. Some things might be too dangerous to allow outside of carefully setup environments. There will of course be things that someone could come up with which shouldn't be allowed and obvious reasons for that. However there are vastly many things which are safe, or dangerous mostly because they are not legal, and may be interesting that are not presently legal in many places.