3 ms·
> NASM uses the so-called Intel syntax while GNU uses the AT&T syntax Which is a great reason not to ever use GNU assembler for anything. > we will be using t
by csense 12y ago
> NASM uses the so-called Intel syntax while GNU uses the AT&T syntax
Which is a great reason not to ever use GNU assembler for anything.
> we will be using the GNU assembler.
AAAAAAGGGGGHHHHHHHHH
- e12e 12y agoWhile I think most people/projects use at&t syntax with gas, it actually seems to support intel syntax pretty well, see eg: https://github.com/0xAX/asm/pull/2/files https://github.com/0xAX/asm/pull/2/files I used to think it was "nasm or nothing" - but gas+intel seems rather pleasant too.