3 ms·
Well seems that simula OOP was a bit more like java/c++. It was Kay who had the message passing idea, and the smalltalk people still don't consider java/c++/sim
by otas 12y ago
Well seems that simula OOP was a bit more like java/c++.
It was Kay who had the message passing idea, and the smalltalk people still don't consider java/c++/simula-derivatives as true OOP languages because they miss that.
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AlanKaysDefinitionOfObjectOriented http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AlanKaysDefinitionOfObjectOriented
http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~ram/pub/pub_jf47ht81Ht/doc_kay_oop_en http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~ram/pub/pub_jf47ht81Ht/doc_kay...
- seanmcdirmid 12y agoI think you have it backwards: OOP in Simula was more bizarre since all objects basically ran as co-routines. It isn't until Smalltalk where we get the non-autonomous objects that we are familiar with today.