One thing comes to mind: Does putting solar panels on every roof (or some other environmental action) really cause less negative impact at a scale than the busi

One thing comes to mind: Does putting solar panels on every roof (or some other environmental action) really cause less negative impact at a scale than the business as usual? I'm not saying it doesn't but I don't have any facts to back it up. It's so complex. How can we take grassrots political action on things that are so inherently complex? Getting the political ball running on climate change was hard enough. How can we efficiently make ourselves (as a species, not the experts) understand what actions are actually needed? edit: Also, instead of endlessly nitpicking factual errors - could we please focus on what value there actually is in the article?