3 ms·

I really think u should read <a>http://jeffreystedfast.blogspot.com/2009/09/mono-not-chasing-tail-lights.html</a> http://jeffreystedfast.blogspot.com/2009/09/mo

by jeswin 17y ago

I really think u should read <a>http://jeffreystedfast.blogspot.com/2009/09/mono-not-chasing-tail-lights.html</a> http://jeffreystedfast.blogspot.com/2009/09/mono-not-chasing.... The larger Mono projects on Linux are built on the language and CLR features implemented in Mono; and don't rely on Microsoft libraries like WinForms. And as far as language features are concerned, the downloadable Mono compiler even implements part of the C# 4 spec. Also, the popular Linux/Mono apps hardly work on Windows. Actually I need not have replied; "....as it'll always be lacking in features compared to Microsoft's implementation" -- i just realized this was pure trolling. Try /.

joe_the_user 17y ago
I've seen large mono project with unresolvable memory leak problems. The problem is that .net is such a vast 'hunk of stuff' that there isn't any way for a single person or a small team to implement is perfectly and the imperfect implementations are fundamentally flawed - ie, memory leaks and strange bugs making mono apps fundamentally unreliable.
grogers 17y ago
"Also, the popular Linux/Mono apps hardly work on Windows." How can this possibly be a good thing? It either means mono is a poor .NET substitute, or the linux mono apps are less cross platform than apps written in other languages - also a bad thing.