3 ms·
Occam were heavy on this. In Occam you explicitly stated which parts of your program were sequential and which were parallel (i.e. commutative), sequentialism n
by tormeh 12y ago
Occam were heavy on this. In Occam you explicitly stated which parts of your program were sequential and which were parallel (i.e. commutative), sequentialism not assumed. Sadly, Occam is a dead language now; it was too far ahead of its time.
- sitkack 12y agohttp://www.xmos.com/ http://www.xmos.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XC_(programming_language) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XC_(programming_language) https://www.xmos.com/support/xkits?subcategory=Starter%20Kits&product=17441&component=17653&page=23 https://www.xmos.com/support/xkits?subcategory=Starter%20Kit...