Yes, that's likely the rationale. This is the counter argument to the freedom argument: good, consistent design and UX seems to require totalitarianism. Otherw

Yes, that's likely the rationale. This is the counter argument to the freedom argument: good, consistent design and UX seems to require totalitarianism. Otherwise you get a confusing hodge podge of junk. I'm starting to see this whole area as a major 21st century problem in computing. How do we have freedom, security, and good UX at the same time?