4 ms·
Check out http://arewefastyet.com/ http://arewefastyet.com/ (the website mentioned in the article), which tracks javascript engine performance. Spidermonkey is
by Jonanin 12y ago
Check out http://arewefastyet.com/ http://arewefastyet.com/ (the website mentioned in the article), which tracks javascript engine performance. Spidermonkey is faster than v8 and Safari's JSC on all three popular javascript benchmarks [1]
[1] Octane (google's benchmark), Sunspider (Apple/Webkit's benchmark), and Kraken (Mozilla's benchmark).
- MBCook 12y agoIs there a reason they don't have the new Safari 8 FTLJIT in those numbers? JSC (Java Script Core?) was Safari 7 wasn't it?
- azakai 12y agoFTL is shown there, but note that FTL only works on 64-bit machines. Click on "machines->mac os x 64-bit" to see the results. They are indeed much better than without FTL.
- Jonanin 12y agoAccording to [1]: "Last week I asked for benchmarks of the new JavascriptCore Fourth Tier LLVM JIT. Arewefastyet from Mozilla now includes such results. FTLJIT does particularly well on asm.js examples." You can see JSC performing better than chrome on the asm.js benchmarks: http://arewefastyet.com/#machine=12&view=breakdown&suite=asmjs-apps http://arewefastyet.com/#machine=12&view=breakdown&suite=asm... [1] http://blog.llvm.org/2014/05/llvm-weekly-19-may-12th-2014.html http://blog.llvm.org/2014/05/llvm-weekly-19-may-12th-2014.ht...