3 ms·
I think this is another false dichotomy. It's quite possible to efficiently limit the damage someone can cause to a project without resorting to verbal abuse.
by Diederich 12y ago
I think this is another false dichotomy. It's quite possible to efficiently limit the damage someone can cause to a project without resorting to verbal abuse.
Most simply, refuse to merge their stuff unless it has quality. You don't have to hold their hand; say: "You are making the same mistakes over and over again. Your stuff isn't going to get merged, and we're not going to spend any time explaining to you why."
- tetha 12y ago> and we're not going to spend any time explaining to you why." "any more time", please. The context should imply this, but some situations require high clarity.
- Diederich 12y agoI don't think 'high clarity' requires the use of verbally abusive language.
- Dylan16807 12y agoThat is both obviously true and bears no connection to the post you're replying to.