4 ms·
The Fermilab press release the article is based on is dated at today (august 26, 2014): http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press_releases/2014/2-D-Hologram-20140
by chton 12y ago
The Fermilab press release the article is based on is dated at today (august 26, 2014): http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press_releases/2014/2-D-Hologram-20140826.html http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press_releases/2014/2-D-Ho...
I've also asked Fermilab directly and they confirm the article is from today, the holometer came online very recently: https://twitter.com/FermilabToday/status/504286464637939712 https://twitter.com/FermilabToday/status/504286464637939712
- gshubert17 12y agoThe August 2014 issue of Scientific American had an article by Afshordi, Mann, and Pourhasan entitled "The Black Hole That Birthed the Big Bang" on a holographic theory of the universe. The article [0] is paywalled, but the preview contains a note from a reader suggesting "the holographic principle shares the same problems of all Idealist notions: rather than relying on evidence, it puts the elegance of the model first as an argument in its favor." I hope the Fermilab experiments provide some useful data. [0] http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-black-hole-that-birthed-the-big-bang/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-black-hole-tha...
- chton 12y agoThat's definitely a valid criticism, and one that can be levelled to a lot of popular theories like string theory (where holographic theory originates from) and quantum loop gravity. It's a short-term problem though, since we're more and more capable of searching for the needed evidence.
- xico 12y agoYeah, formalizing thoughts into models, and then testing them to validate or invalidate them is sooo idealist. I wish scientists would only rely on common sense and holy books, trusting their guts to do the right thing.
- marcosdumay 12y agoThe alternative is first collecting empirical results that current theories do not explain, and only then work on a model for explaining them.