3 ms·
https://www.google.com/search?q=ebola+vitamin+c https://www.google.com/search?q=ebola+vitamin+c To date, no viral infection has been demonstrated to be resista
by eip 12y ago
https://www.google.com/search?q=ebola+vitamin+c https://www.google.com/search?q=ebola+vitamin+c
To date, no viral infection has been demonstrated to be resistant to the proper dosing of vitamin C as classically demonstrated by Klenner. However, not all viruses have been treated with Klenner-sized vitamin C doses, or at least the results have not been published. Ebola viral infection and the other acute viral hemorrhagic fevers appear to be diseases that fall into this category. Because of the seemingly exceptional ability of these viruses to rapidly deplete vitamin C stores, even larger doses of vitamin C would likely be required in order to effectively reverse and eventually cure infections caused by these viruses.
- lambda 12y agoThis sounds like pseudoscience. Your search results also look like either pseudoscience (a "Vitamin C foundation" with 90s style marquee text and Google hit counts for "vitamin c ebola" to bolster its case), or real science that just happens to tangentially mention vitamin C (such as http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/179/Supplement_1/S18.full http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/179/Supplement_1/S18.f... on the use of blood transfusion from recovered patients for treating ebola). You also manage to embed the "no true Scotsman" fallacy into your very short argument; "no viral infection has been demonstrated to be resistant to the proper dosing of vitamin C" is trivially true if you just say that any failed treatment simply wasn't using a "proper dosing of vitamin C".
- sliverstorm 12y agoIt's certainly amusing to imagine the argument, "If a disease has not been cured using vitamin C, that simply means they were not given ENOUGH VITAMIN C whips out wheelbarrow of oranges"