3 ms·
That's a great anecdote, and you've brought up one of our primary hypotheses. A few weeks ago I attended a CoderDojo event in Virginia to deliver our first batc
by mojombo 12y ago
That's a great anecdote, and you've brought up one of our primary hypotheses. A few weeks ago I attended a CoderDojo event in Virginia to deliver our first batch of Codestarter laptops, and it's always amazing to see the demographics. Mostly kids under 12, 50/50 boys/girls and this event was about 90% African American. Seeing the diversity at this age and comparing with the makeup of the professional software industry paints a pretty interesting picture. You can read about the event and see some photos here: http://blog.codestarter.org/post/92559298800/first-delivery-of-codestarter-laptops http://blog.codestarter.org/post/92559298800/first-delivery-...
- johnchristopher 12y agoI am from Europe so pardon me if I totally missed the point but how is 90% african american considered 'diverse' ?
- bpodgursky 12y agoTo be a tad cynical, in the US, "diverse" is often a synonym for non-white.
- 300bps 12y agoIt's actually more specific than that. Diverse means non-"white male".
- celticninja 12y agoDiverse from the tech world in general by having black and female attendees. The tech world is overwhelmingly male and pretty darn white.
- mojombo 12y agoI meant diversity across all the CoderDojo events that I've seen. This one happened to be primarily African American, but in aggregate, the breadth of kids that show up to learn to code is really amazing compared to what we see in colleges and the profession in general.
- electronvolt 12y agoIn this case, it's being compared to the normal demographics of people doing programming/CS related stuff. The demographics here are pretty stark: the percentage of women, and the percentages of hispanic and black people in programming and other tech related jobs (and studying it at the high school/college level) are way, way below their representation in the overall population. So "diverse" can both being used to (as another poster mentioned) refer to "non-white", as in the states it's often used as a byword for that, but I think in this case it's being used as a comparison to the expected demographics. As a much more off topic explanation of why "diverse" gets that use in the US dialogue: the US has serious problems talking about the fact that racism and inequalities along race lines both are still incredibly prevalent; many people would prefer to think it ended after the civil rights movement in the '60s (and that is largely how it is taught in the public school system). Saying something along the lines of "I was impressed by the number of black people/African Americans who attended" or even "I was impressed by how many non-white people attended" isn't politically correct in some circles, (and can open you up to accusations of racism) despite the fact that it mainly acts to highlight underlying inequalities and race lines rather than actually actively perpetuating and enforcing them. However, "diverse" is used as a byword to mean the same thing without actively highlighting any particular racial inequalities, which is more palpable for some people. (In my opinion, more palpable mainly for the people who are uncomfortable acknowledging the problems or who would rather not address them, but that's more social commentary than an explanation of the use.)
- johnchristopher 12y agoThank you, and everyone in the other replies, for the explanation, I have a better understanding of the situation now. In western Europe, Belgium, we would use 'diverse' when there are many nationalities among the attendees (ie: Italians, Moroccans, Turks, African, etc.[0]). Note that I purposely gave southern nationalities to highlight how 'diverse' is also a byword for us: we wouldn't use the word if the attendees were Norwegians, British or German (we would use 'European'). [0] Although nowadays all those people are sadly put under the broader and less subtle 'Arab' or 'Muslim' label.
- seanflyon 12y agoI think calling this group diverse is a slightly sloppy way of saying that this group would increase the diversity of the overall Computer Science community. Also this group was diverse in gender.
- bayesianhorse 12y agoProbably because the population they recruited participants from had a similar distribution. "Diversity" as a slogan is somewhat misleading, because what these initiatives try to do is to counterbalance negative selection of characteristics like skin color, parental income etc which shouldn't matter in coding. Also "minorities" has become a difficult term because of spatial segregation, demographics, blending, and even the decline of racial prejudices (which is a good thing) blurs the lines of who's the majority and who's the minority in a particular issue.