3 ms·
You mentioned the problems with CAP theorem. Did you investigate methods to use eventual consistency in AP system?
by CMCDragonkai 12y ago
You mentioned the problems with CAP theorem. Did you investigate methods to use eventual consistency in AP system?
- api 12y agoWith eventual consistency "eventual" becomes a long time with a big network. Either that or the bandwidth requirements become massive. It would be an example of choosing security and decentralization at the expense of efficiency.
- CMCDragonkai 12y agoWould it be possible to make zerotier tunable so in some networks you care about efficiency, in others you could make it eventually consistent. I know there are lots of different methods for eventual consistency that could be used and compared for performance.
- api 12y agoTunable means there's now something else people have to understand, which means nobody will use it.
- CMCDragonkai 12y agoI'm sure the zero-conf can be default. But for some custom enterprisy work or projects, having something tunable for eventual consistency is something I would use.
- api 12y agoMulticast presently does have some tunable parameters, but so far they all have acceptable defaults and are hidden. I will probably expose them under an advanced tab in the future. So I didn't mean to be totally dismissive... My point was just that every tunable parameter a user has to interact with loses you an exponential number of users.