4 ms·
Eh? Did you read the post? "I wrote a simple YouTube client app using the latest YouTube APIs" - The content was not pirated, he created an app with one purpos
by alistairjcbrown 12y ago
Eh? Did you read the post?
"I wrote a simple YouTube client app using the latest YouTube APIs" - The content was not pirated, he created an app with one purpose; to allow you to play videos from one particular YouTube channel.
- stonemetal 12y agoWhat is your definition of pirated? Accessing content, and helping others access content in ways that you have not been given permission to rather sounds like piracy to me. The method of access doesn't really matter weather it be boot leg DVDs or youtube.
- alistairjcbrown 12y ago"helping others access content in ways that you have not been given permission" - That doesn't sound like what he did. The videos were uploaded to YouTube and he used the YouTube API to display those videos as part of his app.
- Dylan16807 12y agoPiracy is making unauthorized copies, either to or from another person.
- Keyframe 12y agoI think there would be no issue with it if he had not used trademark names and logos. API calls to youtube, pulling up a channel, playing videos... if Youtube/Google doesn't have a policy like Apple to not allow apps that duplicate their apps functionality, I don't see how it could be a problem. Most probably is that problem arose with trademark infringement. This is a serious issue since 3rd party using your trademark without authorization can tarnish your carefully crafted design/brand experience as well as confuse customers.