3 ms·
I was referring to a mainly historic, very strict export ban that categorizes cryptographic software as munitions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_crypt
by scott_karana 12y ago
I was referring to a mainly historic, very strict export ban that categorizes cryptographic software as munitions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_U...
HTTPS was crippled, since Netscape shipped only 40-bit RC4 internationally.[1]
PGP's source code was printed so it would fall under First Amendment protections, since binaries weren't legal for export.[2] (See also DJB's Bernstein v. United States)[3]
OpenBSD/OpenSSH is still based in Canada to avoid being subject to the laws.
--------------
1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_United_States#PC_era http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_U...
2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy#Criminal_investigation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy#Criminal_in... and http://www.pgpi.org/pgpi/project/scanning/ http://www.pgpi.org/pgpi/project/scanning/
3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_v._United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_v._United_States
4 http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html
- VMG 12y agoI know, but in the end they couldn't keep it that way forever.
- scott_karana 12y agoYes, of course. Isn't it conceivable that the government would implement a similarly short-sighted (and ineffectual) policy if Bitcoins were seriously used to harm the US? :-P