24 ms·
That sounds a lot like my workflow actually. You can still actually use tmux with it, with one session per workflow ('^b $' can name the session from inside it)
by Tyr42 12y ago
That sounds a lot like my workflow actually.
You can still actually use tmux with it, with one session per workflow ('^b $' can name the session from inside it).
I found it useful, especially with Clojure and vim.
The splits are nice everywhere, and it's way better to be in the habit of opening a tmux/screen when sshing.
That workflow is also why I hate OSX updates that force a reboot, which piles all the terminal and Chrome windows in one desktop. And then it's just an update for RAW camera files or something that I don't care about, but it nags me every day. /rant
- scott_s 12y agoI still use screen remotely. This workflow is for the Mac in front of me. A lot of the terminals I have locally are associated with a screen session remotely. But keeping the local sessions open, active and logically grouped helps me remember what I was doing, and need to do.
- baweaver 12y agoAlmost sounds like a cause for making some type of TODO tool for TMUX
- GrinningFool 12y agoThanks for that about '$', I didn't know we could rename sessions.