> On the one hand Google's results can cause a lot of damage Public, factual information causes damage and Google is responsible because somebody else reported

> On the one hand Google's results can cause a lot of damage Public, factual information causes damage and Google is responsible because somebody else reported on it and they indexed it? And so Google should stop linking to the article which will still exist and can be found on other search engines in other jurisdictions without any effort? And we can pretend online censorship works all of a sudden now that the EU found a "good" excuse for it? > The European Court ruled that some things should be made harder to find (revenge porn, obvious slander, spent convictions etc.). So what does freedom of expression mean to you, then? A regulated, controlled public discourse with arbitrary rules about what the government thinks is relevant or important for people to know or read about? And it looks like you slipped "spent convictions" in there, which throws off the argument. I think you already made your mind up.