5 ms·
I would appreciate a couple examples showing more typical bitrates at 256kbps and 320kbps. I like what it is, but there's this lossy difference between the argu
by pistle 12y ago
I would appreciate a couple examples showing more typical bitrates at 256kbps and 320kbps. I like what it is, but there's this lossy difference between the argument being made and reality. Now, if I could get a copy of the intended argument, I could invert the phase with this site and show you the difference.
- orbitur 12y agoThe argument being made is more about art, not "mp3 bad".
- Dylan16807 12y agoOkay, but the art is dancing around an actual important technical question without answering it, even though it would take far less effort to do so.
- bodyfour 12y agoI'd refer you to the top-voted comment from @ daturkel. Because of the psychoacoustic models used for lossy audio compression (and, in particular, the "masking" effect) listening to these delta signals won't give you useful information about the compressor's accuracy.
- Dylan16807 12y agoI disagree. It gives you information you have to treat carefully, but it is useful. Especially to compare different bitrates. I'm not even sure what bitrate this used, maybe 128 like the example files?
- krick 12y agoThat "sines" example was 320kbps in case you didn't notice. Judging by that I can imagine that less radical compression for other music pieces would make pretty similar ghosts, just, well, less radical. Not so hard to check it for yourself, anyway.