3 ms·
I agree on the pricing. We currently manage our decks in a page with our logo and an iframe with Google docs preview below. Paying 200$/m is tempting if they co
by ecesena 12y ago
I agree on the pricing. We currently manage our decks in a page with our logo and an iframe with Google docs preview below. Paying 200$/m is tempting if they could provide useful connections. Just for the storage, even the 90$/m seems a bit high (pre funding, of course).
- gdilla 12y agowhat about a simple one time purchase? I imagine the half life of a good pitch is really short. So your churn will be high. If people last a long time on your service, they have other problems.
- theflyingkiwi42 12y agoAs a potential user, I'd like that. A monthly subscription is just another thing I need to manage. Also, I feel like I am paying for a time where I may not be using it yet (there's a time delay between setting it up and actually going out to investors). And the jump from $89 to $199 just for a CNAME is a little high as well.
- mastef 12y agoIf that works for you, this is great! Not everybody needs a secured presentation, and if you can create a page manually, that doesn't need access control, a CRM connector, slide behaviour tracking, activity notifications and/or lead background information - and if it looks great on mobile and other devices - then by all means! The problem we solve is not the hardest problem in the world. It simply takes a lot of time to get around it, to maintain it and to implement all the 'nice to haves' into it. As we like to say in the XO office - "it's simple, not easy" If you can do it yourself, without hiring another person for much more money than the existing solutions out there cost; and if it doesn't keep you from your main focus - then that's the way to go.