4 ms·

I might question that statement. Being a passenger on an airplane requires you to accept a certain amount of responsibility. A person unable to behave properly

I might question that statement. Being a passenger on an airplane requires you to accept a certain amount of responsibility. A person unable to behave properly and/or refrain from harming others in some way (angry, drunk, high, insane, actively trying to crash the airplane, physically abusive, having a communicable disease, etc) should probably be banned from air travel until their behavior and/or ability to harm others can be controlled.

reustle 12y ago
I have never smoked in my life, and I don't plan to, but did you just put people that are high in the same bucket as drunks and insane people? They are very different types of people.
- nickpapa 12y ago
  Marijuana isn't the only drug that gets you high. He was using "high" in the sense of other, more harmful drugs that completely distort your reality and can cause you to become violent. Remember the bath salt incidents a while back?
- pavel_lishin 12y ago
  "high" doesn't imply only marijuana. I would prefer to not be on the same airplane as someone who's just consumed a large amount of methamphetamines, or LSD, or cocaine.
- interurban 12y ago
  Getting high isn't just limited to smoking marijuana... There are a huge array of substances that could cause safety concerns for passengers on an airplane.
- unreal37 12y ago
  I mean it generally, high as in "people who can't control their behavior due to recent drug use". If you know someone who just ingested "a bunch" of LSD, should that person be on an airplane for 8 hours? Can they control their behavior and not be a nuisance to others or difficult for staff to give instructions to?
- vertex-four 12y ago
  I'll point out that someone who is high on marijuana could be a potential hazard during an incident, although may be less likely to cause one themselves.
Nanzikambe 12y ago
Hows about children? Seeing as they legally they can't accept any amount of responsibility - can we ban them too? I mean toddlers have to count as either high or insane and probably would try crash the plane if they weren't restrained. Plus imagine how peaceful flights would be ..
- adventured 12y ago
  Children don't have to accept legal responsibility, parents do that for them in most instances. So your point is nullified.
  - deleted 12y ago
    [deleted]

reustle 12y ago

I have never smoked in my life, and I don't plan to, but did you just put people that are high in the same bucket as drunks and insane people? They are very different types of people.

nickpapa 12y ago
Marijuana isn't the only drug that gets you high. He was using "high" in the sense of other, more harmful drugs that completely distort your reality and can cause you to become violent. Remember the bath salt incidents a while back?
pavel_lishin 12y ago
"high" doesn't imply only marijuana. I would prefer to not be on the same airplane as someone who's just consumed a large amount of methamphetamines, or LSD, or cocaine.
interurban 12y ago
Getting high isn't just limited to smoking marijuana... There are a huge array of substances that could cause safety concerns for passengers on an airplane.
unreal37 12y ago
I mean it generally, high as in "people who can't control their behavior due to recent drug use". If you know someone who just ingested "a bunch" of LSD, should that person be on an airplane for 8 hours? Can they control their behavior and not be a nuisance to others or difficult for staff to give instructions to?
vertex-four 12y ago
I'll point out that someone who is high on marijuana could be a potential hazard during an incident, although may be less likely to cause one themselves.

Nanzikambe 12y ago

Hows about children? Seeing as they legally they can't accept any amount of responsibility - can we ban them too? I mean toddlers have to count as either high or insane and probably would try crash the plane if they weren't restrained. Plus imagine how peaceful flights would be ..

adventured 12y ago
Children don't have to accept legal responsibility, parents do that for them in most instances. So your point is nullified.
- deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]