9 ms·
Though I have no qualifications in the field of study, it does explain in detail the methodologies, and the specific parameters are narrow and objective. My on
by Daishiman 12y ago
Though I have no qualifications in the field of study, it does explain in detail the methodologies, and the specific parameters are narrow and objective.
My only gripe is that the samples are taken from people going to fertility clinics, but it seems to be accounted for as best as possible.
It would be interesting if more studies were done explaining the interplay of biological mechanisms that lead to this from exposure to RF, as well as accounting exactly how much of this is due to device heat and how much from RF exposure.
- lmg643 12y agoI think this is a very important point - people who go to fertility clinics are already having problems and not representative/random. Further, a "meta analysis" means they are not doing original research, they are just culling together other papers on the subject into a single study. I'm terrified to think this study could be accurate.
- devindotcom 12y agoWell they're taking data from studies already done, but it's not just like they put a bunch of papers in a bucket and stir - if it's a smart meta-analysis (and there are other kinds) they'll be looking for effects suggested by data but not looked for in the original studies. Like if you did a meta-analysis of a hundred experimental cancer treatments that took down detailed demographics and found that people living in certain areas of the country were more likely to develop cervical cancer or something. It's definitely "original research" but it's not experimental research.