5 ms·
Things Windows 7 does that Vista doesn't
- dkersten 17y agoI dunno, since I switched to a tiled window manager, these types of "lists of cool features in ..." have become so anticlimactic for me.. most of those features just aren't that useful once you go get used to tiling.
- eru 17y agoI demand hardware acceleration for my xmonad!
- mark_h 17y agoYou joke, but... my work laptop (Dell D630) has some low-end intel video card, and it can't even drive dual monitors. The redraw when I switch between workspaces -- which I do a lot, especially when on the built-in screen -- is painful :(
- dkersten 17y agoNot impossible. Not sure how much you'd gain from it, but I certainly wouldn't complain :-P
- blasdel 17y agoBut Windows 7 introduces several window tiling features to the masses! Try dragging a window to a screen edge -- it makes it really easy to tile two windows.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- dkersten 17y agoThe "more or less" is the important part here :-D
- sp332 17y agoYay native ISO burner! Also, the Windows Explorer built-in .zip file manager isn't freaking slow anymore (though 7-zip still puts it to shame with speed and compression ratios).
- pbhjpbhj 17y agoPresumably they don't want to add bloat by allowing more than one compression type, sticking in a free tar.bz2 compression routine would break the bank too I expect.</thinlyveiledsarcasm>
- dkersten 17y agoYep, because they care about bloat.
- uhjnybt 17y agoBut it won't let you mount an ISO to view files inside, or create an ISO so you still need the addin tools
- pbhjpbhj 17y agoThe only thing I see as genuinely innovative their is the "problem solver" taking screencaps for every mouse click then creating a webpage and allowing commentary to be added. Seems like a nice little utility app - I'd like to see that in ksnapshot. The other things, MP3 preview, recently used lists (now with added marketing-ese), window placement, .. hardly revolutionary. They added a seamless VM to ease upgrade from XP, nice one (but not really innovation, I can have my virtualbox run seamlessly (but prefer it windowed)). Any reasons there to upgrade from Vista or XP? I didn't notice one.
- ivank 17y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_removed_in_Windows_7 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_removed_in_Windows_7
- jsonscripter 17y agoI think we need an "X number of things every other popular operating system does that Windows doesn't" article. To start off: * Multiple users on the same machine at the same time * Software repositories * Useful software pre-installed (windows doesn't have IM, office tools, or photo editing software) * Advanced filesystems available
- ironsam 17y agoMicrosoft often gets sued anytime they try to pre-install useful software with their OS.
- jz 17y ago17. Native ISO Burner. I haven't used Windows in about 5 years, but it still amazes me that this was not baked in to Vista. My parents purchased a Vista desktop computer a couple months back. My dad called me on day 2 asking me how to burn a cd. He gave up on Vista after day 3. The awesome dual core Vista box sits and collects dust while he continues to use his XP (1 Ghz) computer where he has Roxio or some other crap already installed/setup.
- DenisM 17y agoimgburn - free burner software
- jz 17y agoThe article should really be called "18 things you never thought for the life of you would not be included in Vista that we will present as if they are groundbreaking features"
- DenisM 17y agoBecause each product version should contain all features from all future releases?
- boredguy8 17y agoThis is silly. I use OS X all day at work and can't WAIT to get home and work on my Win7 box where switching between applications, changing their size, and navigating within the window isn't a royal pain in the ass.
- lurkinggrue 17y agoThe problem recorder seem cool, I will have to use it when making tutorials here at work.
- thamer 17y agoHa. In the first picture of the article, the Explorer “jumplist” shows a directory named “20 cool things windows 7 does th...”. This article only lists 18. I guess the list was hard to fill?
- bitbukkit 17y agoThe "Imagine Parallels on Mac OS X without the need to fish out money on an extra OS" comment regarding XP mode strikes me as a bit disingenuous. The more apt comparison I think would be Classic/OS 9 or PowerPC compatibility - which Apple did provide for free (Classic mode and Rosetta).