4 ms·

I assume you mean this one: http://www.secure-medicine.org/public/publications/icd-study.pdf http://www.secure-medicine.org/public/publications/icd-study... Y

I assume you mean this one: http://www.secure-medicine.org/public/publications/icd-study.pdf http://www.secure-medicine.org/public/publications/icd-study... You would need to be specific about which one of the linked documents you meant, there were several. All the hacking attempts started off with a manufacturer's programmer and worked back from there. In the example using a software radio, the researchers were able to replay sniffed commands to the device after it had been activated by the programmer. Which of the reports talked about a device being compromised without using a manufacturers programmer?

pbhjpbhj 12y ago
Yes. I've not pored over it but they said: >"We implemented several active [replay] attacks using [only] the USRP and a BasicTX daughterboard to transmit on the 175 kHz band." // Yes, they used a programmer for reverse engineering purposes but from my - admittedly brief - look at the paper it seemed they performed active attacks (page 8(A) onwards) without using the programmer. So they previously used a programmer but the attacks were performed without one. Assumed true it seems a reasonable PoC that contradicts the essence of your statement which seemed to say all "hacks" needed a manufacturers programmer to perform.