4 ms·
Depends on tolerance for failure. Take a heavily trafficked area like time square, what is the probability that your 100 pictures would capture a clean pixel f
by stonemetal 12y ago
Depends on tolerance for failure. Take a heavily trafficked area like time square, what is the probability that your 100 pictures would capture a clean pixel for a spot across the square even once, let alone enough for it to "win". Say lots of people are wearing black coats, black might accidentally "win" a few pixels here or there.
- pbhjpbhj 12y agoI'd actually quite like to see a series of progressively enhanced images made in this way. Like 1 pic every second, take, the mode pixels; repeat for 10 pics, 100, 1000, ... might be interesting. There's probably a range across the number of images that ties with the busy-ness of an area to create some interesting visual effects? Like is there a point where an image starts to appear out of the noise, could that be an effective measurement technique (counting insects/cataloguing their level of activity?)?