3 ms·
It looks good. But Helvetica was good too. Anyone have any thoughts on why the switch?
by kevinwang 12y ago
It looks good. But Helvetica was good too. Anyone have any thoughts on why the switch?
- redwall_hp 12y agoBecause enormous serif type is trendy right now.
- LoganCale 12y agoGotham and Helvetica are both sans-serif.
- Goopplesoft 12y agoFrom their assets site: > Words don’t just hold meaning; they communicate by their very form. We primarily use the Gotham font family: elegant and direct, stylish but not exclusive. Putting well-designed words in our product enhances the user experience. Not sure what the 'but not exclusive.' is implying though... Source: https://about.twitter.com/press/brand-assets https://about.twitter.com/press/brand-assets
- 80 12y agoStill not sure if I agree with it but Lawrence Weiner has a great quote on Helvetica: "[Helvetica] it’s one of the type faces that I absolutely detest. It’s totally authoritative. It in fact does not adapt itself to things and all information that comes out in Helvetica is saying exactly the same thing: this is cultural, this is intellectual, and this is intelligent. I’m rather afraid that words don’t start off being cultural, intellectual, or intelligent."
- joezydeco 12y agoExcept you know what? I can see Helvetica on my screen. Gotham is literally disappearing into the background.
- prawn 12y ago"Not sure what the 'but not exclusive.' is implying though..." As in not snobby. Imagine a wealthy and well-dressed business man who still takes the time to help you in the street rather than ignore you because their time is more important than yours.
- dueprocess 12y agoHelvetica-fatigue. It's everywhere, that and Arial, Open Sans and a hundred other clones. Gothic is a nice change. It's roomier. More easy going. I like it too.
- largehotcoffee 12y agoOnly it's not at all.