6 ms·
Fab Lays Off One-Third of Global Headcount, Slashing New York City Staff
- jtchang 12y agoCompetition has really heated up since the last time I checked out Fab. It strikes me that this news is the first time I've heard about what Fab was up to in a long time. I can't really think of anything that would make me go "oh...let me go check out fab.com and see if they have it". This is unlike groupon which seems to have spent an ungodly amount of money (in a good way) in marketing and positioning.
- kosei 12y agoAlways seemed to me that Fab should have spent their money on marketing and positioning, trying to put themselves as a major internet retailer for fashion and modern, high-end living. Instead it appears that they went out of sight, out of mind for many.
- billmalarky 12y agoMost of Fab's growth was actually driven by high spending on marketing and positioning. http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/230081 http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/230081 Search for "what went wrong"
- ForHackernews 12y agoThis is literally the first time I've ever heard of this company.
- bstar77 12y agoI see some of their stuff in target, they have a little section at the store near me. The products generally seem useful and well made and reasonably priced.
- hkmurakami 12y agoTotally thought this was a semiconductor fab layoff and was utterly perplexed by the NYC location. "Fabulous" makes more sense.
- dbcooper 12y agoAs did I. I was getting very worried about the next two nodes from IBM and Global Foundries. ;-)
- hkmurakami 12y agoYup, totally thought that this was an IBM related thing, and that the "C" part of NYC was a typo!
- megablast 12y agoOh exactly, not sure why we should care about an ecommerce site with layoffs, as opposed to the 100s of other companies with layoffs. Including HP laying off 16,000.
- hkmurakami 12y agoomg is that a recent development? Which departments are affected? (PC business I presume)
- eitally 12y agohttp://recode.net/2014/05/22/hp-shares-slip-as-q2-sales-come-in-slightly-below-expectations/ http://recode.net/2014/05/22/hp-shares-slip-as-q2-sales-come...
- scottfr 12y agoRemember the CEO's idiotic (and apparently now deleted) blog post: "It's a fucking startup, why are you here" [1]. I guess 1/3 of the staff couldn't come up with a good enough answer. It's a shame they're the one's getting axed and not the CEO. [1] http://www.fastcompany.com/3029439/most-innovative-companies/fab-ceo-sent-this-terrifying-memo-in-a-bizarre-attempt-to-rally-hi http://www.fastcompany.com/3029439/most-innovative-companies...
- confluence 12y ago> why are you here To get fucking fired by incompetent blowhards apparently. That appears to be the norm with most startups, and companies for that matter. Sad state of affairs.
- adventured 12y agoManagement demolishes $300 million in venture capital, employees get axed instead.
- jpatokal 12y agoMost of that $300 million was spent on salaries for employees.
- nerfhammer 12y agoHow much of it was spent on salaries for managers?
- tptacek 12y agoIf most of the employees are technical, and the company is run like a typical tech company (ie, with too much middle management, but not headcount literally dominated by them), then line employee headcount costs likely dwarf those of management. That is one reason why executive compensation can get so outrageous; if you have a lot of employees, most singular expenses become rounding errors.
- 12y ago
- mtgentry 12y agoAs someone who sold on Fab in the past, I wish them the best. They always treated their vendors well and their operations team was top notch. Hopefully they'll figure it out.
- aresant 12y agoI bought some stuff around Christmas and then got spammed out of love with them. I had no idea that they had made another pivot from the flash-sales site I signed up for. Checking out their current homepage and seeing them "reimaging" sofas as their new business does not give me a lot of faith that they're going to have a happy ending.
- goatforce5 12y agoBefore they were a flash sales site, they were a gay social network: http://www.fastcompany.com/1835757/fabcom-ready-set-reset http://www.fastcompany.com/1835757/fabcom-ready-set-reset
- clamprecht 12y agoAnyone remember Jobster.com? Same CEO as Fab.com now.
- ChrisNorstrom 12y agoEDIT: Experience with Fab is based on December 2012 - March 2013. When I sold through them as a vendor I remember Fab being extremely inefficient in nearly everything they did. I had to email a good 3-5 people to get anything done because nothing was automated. From shipments to payments to setting up the sale to uploading media and printing out orders and postage. Everything was done manually by emailing someone and yes there were mistakes. I had to use excel, save the file they emailed, and email it back to them just to set up a proposal for a sale. Yes, Microsoft Excel. And they sent any type of instructions in PDF formats. They also used some really expensive shipping options even though I had cheaper alternatives and was doing fulfillment myself. I had to manually sign up for a UPS account and get approved to have them charged and all sorts of nonsense. They also wanted me to set up a UPS pick up ($8) every day. With their margins I just don't understand how they made money. Apparently they weren't which is why things got bad. And their marketing was just such a waste at times. They'd mail a 3 sided folded postcard on extremely thick paper with only 3 random items on it (that weren't even interesting) and their "Fab, Smile, you're designed to" logo. They did a terrible job advertising and it all lacked thoughtfulness. Their in-house fulfillment team used custom boxes that were printed in all BLACK ink and on top of that had printing on the inside with their logos and catch phrase on the inside and out. I have never in my life seen shipping boxes that expensive used to ship an item. EDIT: I'm not saying they weren't nice to work with, they were all extremely pleasant, just the system of doing things was very inefficient. Rather than emailing me so many different forms and PDF instructions they could have linked to them on the FAB control panel. It's the CEOs job of ensuring the systems a business uses are efficient and it seems that's what destroyed them. Wasting money.
- arbuge 12y agoWhen did you do business with them? Early days or more recently? Curious because that seems at odds with the experience of at least 1 other vendor posting in these comments...
- hagbardgroup 12y agoThis reflects what I have read elsewhere. What they would do is bid wastefully using weak creative and little targeting as if they were actively trying to waste as much money as possible (which may have been what they were doing).
- iamleppert 12y agoEnough moves like this and nobody is going to want to work for this company. Enough moves like this and the CEO (Jason), a huge pre-madonna and drama queen, is going to have a tough time getting money from investors for his next "venture". Kudos for him for trying, but he certainly strikes me as a CEO I wouldn't want to work for.
- md224 12y agoJust a quick note -- and don't feel bad, this is a common mistake -- the phrase is actually "prima donna", not "pre-madonna".
- ultimatedelman 12y agogentlest grammar correction i have ever seen on the internet. bravo!
- twic 12y agoPerhaps he really was comparing Mr Goldberg to a young Mary of Nazareth? I confess that the point of such an analogy eludes me. Something to do with carpentry?
- md224 12y agoNot sure if you're just being snarky, but I would assume people who write "pre-Madonna" are under the impression it's a reference to the pop star (which sort of makes sense).
- mrev19 12y agohow language evolves
- ForHackernews 12y agoIt's an excellent eggcorn, at any rate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggcorn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggcorn
- 12y ago
- abraham_s 12y agoThe CEO was in news for being mad at someone who didn't switch seats with him on a plane. http://www.businessinsider.com/fabcom-founder-baffled-by-passenger-who-declined-100-to-switch-seats-with-him-on-plane-2013-7 http://www.businessinsider.com/fabcom-founder-baffled-by-pas...
- amac 12y agoThe private label strategy, though appearing as a last resort, does make some sense i.e gross margins improvement. I think this serves as a lesson to those folks operating with primarily or even just operating partly in ecommerce. That is, if you're selling other people's stuff it's an efficiency play whilst if you're selling your own stuff, you've got more room to maneuver with margin.