5 ms·

Not only that, but the slides are JPG with horrible artifacts, and the text is JPG too, making it look bad and not be compatible with screen readers.

• ams6110 12y ago
  The software is meant to generate content for an X11 viewer/presentation app using a simple text-based markup as input. The HTML is an export. It's not what the software was really designed to produce. That said, I don't know if the quality of the slides is really any better in the native viewer.
  • Dylan16807 12y ago
    That's not really an excuse for using jpg instead of png for a bunch of text.
    • clarry 12y ago
      How about this: the program supports images and backgrounds. Therefore using JPG makes sense.
      • Dylan16807 12y ago
        I disagree that it makes sense, but that's okay.
      • SwellJoe 12y ago
        Text is its primary output. JPG is never the right choice for text.
    • ams6110 12y ago
      Consider the age of the program. It was first developed in 1997. The png format was very new and not even standardized yet. Some (most?) web browsers didn't support it or only supported it in the latest version, at a time when auto-updating browsers didn't exist.
  • _cipher_ 12y ago
    >I don't know if the quality of the slides is really any better in the native viewer. They can be with % mgp -D <dir> -E png <mgpfile> :) Defaults to jpg though.
• deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]
• efftee 12y ago
  You can view the raw text via the "[text]" link on the top left.