3 ms·

>>A little downtime from time to time can't be avoided. People just love to complain. If you feel this way then image-editing isn't your core task in your job.

by smtddr 12y ago

>>A little downtime from time to time can't be avoided. People just love to complain. If you feel this way then image-editing isn't your core task in your job. Imagine if the github.com maintainers had your attitude. "Meh, some downtime here 'n there. Whuchagonnado?" A github outage for _OVER 24 HOURS_ would freakin' wreck me and my coworkers. The image-editing department for a high-fashion magazine in New York or Paris with those already near-impossible deadlines losing 24hrs is going to make some execs somewhere very angry.

voltagex_ 12y ago
No one other than Adobe can provide a Creative Cloud that you can type cc add remote creativebucket.org and keep working. You can, however, type git add remote bitbucket and should be working to several remotes.
l0stb0y 12y ago
And yet another fashion magazine expert. So many! I'd like to point out that your image is solely based on low-grade chick-flicks.
sureshv 12y ago
I would think git's distributed nature would make this a lesser issue. You would just have to set up another remote target and push/pull from that (say on AWS or some other provider).
- e12e 12y ago
  Sure. But not having access to the tickets database might cripple a team pretty badly. One reason I'm still toying with the idea of trying fossil[1] "for real" and/or find/make a tool that distributes issues within mercurial/git like http://www.bugseverywhere.org/ http://www.bugseverywhere.org/ Note-to-self: looks like hattawiki might be a nice companion on the path to "distributed everything": http://hatta-wiki.org/Install http://hatta-wiki.org/Install [1] https://www.fossil-scm.org/ https://www.fossil-scm.org/
  - pedrocr 12y ago
    For a distributed wiki try gollum. It's the wiki engine behind the github wikis and it's basically a wiki where the database is a git repo. I love it for family use. I can put up a nice web interface for everyone else to edit and yet I use git push/pull and my normal text editor. Works great.
gohrt 12y ago
Turn it around into a special no-Photoshop issue of the magazine, and disrupt the high-fashion industry!

by smtddr 12y ago

voltagex_ 12y ago

No one other than Adobe can provide a Creative Cloud that you can type cc add remote creativebucket.org and keep working. You can, however, type git add remote bitbucket and should be working to several remotes.

l0stb0y 12y ago

And yet another fashion magazine expert. So many! I'd like to point out that your image is solely based on low-grade chick-flicks.

sureshv 12y ago

I would think git's distributed nature would make this a lesser issue. You would just have to set up another remote target and push/pull from that (say on AWS or some other provider).

e12e 12y ago
Sure. But not having access to the tickets database might cripple a team pretty badly. One reason I'm still toying with the idea of trying fossil[1] "for real" and/or find/make a tool that distributes issues within mercurial/git like http://www.bugseverywhere.org/ http://www.bugseverywhere.org/ Note-to-self: looks like hattawiki might be a nice companion on the path to "distributed everything": http://hatta-wiki.org/Install http://hatta-wiki.org/Install [1] https://www.fossil-scm.org/ https://www.fossil-scm.org/
- pedrocr 12y ago
  For a distributed wiki try gollum. It's the wiki engine behind the github wikis and it's basically a wiki where the database is a git repo. I love it for family use. I can put up a nice web interface for everyone else to edit and yet I use git push/pull and my normal text editor. Works great.

gohrt 12y ago

Turn it around into a special no-Photoshop issue of the magazine, and disrupt the high-fashion industry!