3 ms·

Do we need UX innovation? Whenever I hear about something lacking "UX innovation", the specifics just point out where it's ugly. I'd like to know what the pro

• pbhjpbhj 12y ago
  It's a bit like using GIMP. (Despite still not being able to promote it in most social situations because the name sounds offensive in polite conversation) I've got used to GIMP, I find it comfortable and logical enough to get things done. Similarly with KDE, I've been using it well over a decade - I don't want the interface or UX to alter drastically. It's a DE, it needs to show me system data, enable config and otherwise tie the ends together whilst keeping out of the way of the applications being run. I don't really care if it's ugly in default. I'll add an icon pack and a theme a few seconds after a new install anyway. It's not like a console is exactly beautiful - except in a minimalist tech aesthetic sort of way - but I still use it and it does the necessary. This is one of the great things about open source, the choice. If you want fancy-schmanzy UX innovation go with Ubu' default mainstream offering. That said KDE is innovating - eg with Activities, and with PIM integration - but in ways I can thankfully ignore.