3 ms·
I submitted this yesterday under the current URL, so that probably would have failed. I think a lot of people submit alternate URLs for articles that failed to
by timr 13y ago
I submitted this yesterday under the current URL, so that probably would have failed. I think a lot of people submit alternate URLs for articles that failed to get traction due to bad timing or whatever.
- protomyth 13y agoActually, I submitted because I liked how it was summarized and linked to the new york story. Original sources don't seem to be valued by folks up voting. [edit] can moderators change the submitter to the person who originally submitted this article?
- timr 13y agoHaha. Don't worry about it. I was just pointing out why someone might not have submitted the original. (One of these days I might be able to trade in my karma points for the really big stuffed animal, but for now, it's just mustache combs...)
- protomyth 13y agoI was hoping for a go cart, I remember those from the back of comics..... On the article, Reason Magazine's article is http://reason.com/blog/2014/04/30/san-francisco-new-airbnb-snitch-plan http://reason.com/blog/2014/04/30/san-francisco-new-airbnb-s... "San Francisco May Wind Up Paying Residents to Snitch on Neighbors Using Airbnb" - nice for the headline to be the tldr
- dang 13y agoYes, that's an issue. We've got a bunch of ideas for working on this, and related problems with story quality and original sources. Perhaps one day I'll even be able to write a line of code again. :)