3 ms·

I wish either AWS Route 53 or Google Cloud DNS would support being a BIND protocol secondary :(

• scott_karana 13y ago
  No kidding. I love the local speeds, and no doubt Google and Amazon do a good job of redundancy, but I'm sure as hell not going to put all my eggs in one basket. Not with DNS. I had the same problem earlier this year, and if Rackspace or Route53 had AXFR support, I would have used them in a heartbeat...
  • ithkuil 13y ago
    axfr support might be useful even if you end up using them as primary: 1. migration 2. standard "config" API. You just keep up using your scripts to generate/update bind/tinydns configs.
• colmmacc 13y ago
  Route 53 developer here. That's on our roadmap, but in the mean time there is this; https://code.google.com/p/route53d/ https://code.google.com/p/route53d/
  • robinson-wall 13y ago
    Nice. Any idea if "internal" zones (private DNS for my VPC) will be supported by route53 at any point?