2 ms·
What I've learned is that complex political issues -- essentially anything that isn't a universal "no-brainer" -- comes down to tradeoffs. In fact, I've found
by wdr1 13y ago
What I've learned is that complex political issues -- essentially anything that isn't a universal "no-brainer" -- comes down to tradeoffs.
In fact, I've found a good political test to see if the person I'm speaking to can articulate a valid criticism of their own position. I.e., if they're for universal healthcare can they state why one would oppose it, without calling into question the opposition's character.
If they can, you can have a fairly thoughtful discussion/debate on the topic.
If they can't, then there's no point discussing things.
- bsilvereagle 13y agoI use a similar methodology when teammates disagree on a design point, have them argue the other side. In nearly every case the dispute is settled.