4 ms·
They aren't banning it because they use it internally. They aren't banning it at all. This is an accident.
by gress 13y ago
They aren't banning it because they use it internally.
They aren't banning it at all. This is an accident.
- bigiain 13y agoSo they "accidentally" took this guy's ball and went home. Which has resulted in an effective "automated banning" of the guy's tool. I'm half inclined to suggest that publicly outing that kind of behaviour on your own blog is _exactly_ the right response to that sort of "accident". When their "accident" has some quite serious consequences for everybody except the people who carelessly allowed the accident to happen, and when the people who need to fix the "accident" are hidden behind Apple's legendarily un-approachable app store review process - "public shaming" seems like an entirely appropriate reaction.
- gress 13y agoAre you seriously saying they did this on purpose?
- Dylan16807 13y agoNegligently, not on purpose, but not 'truly' an accident.
- gress 13y agoThis is clearly not negligence. It's an exotic scenario.