3 ms·
They went on to: "Reports that NSA or any other part of the government were aware of the so-called Heartbleed vulnerability before April 2014 are wrong." so the
by tgb 13y ago
They went on to: "Reports that NSA or any other part of the government were aware of the so-called Heartbleed vulnerability before April 2014 are wrong." so there's no weasel-wording going on here.
- coldtea 13y agoNo, just straight out lying.
- sehugg 13y agoThat could mean anything from "there was a typo" to "there were factual omissions that were unknown to the author".
- theg2 13y agoOr, it could mean you're just be pedantic.
- ithought 13y agoPerhaps they're using the etymological root of aware, which is "wary", and they mean they were unconcerned with its existence as they were unwary/unaware of any possible dangers with it since it was unknown to hostile forces.