I really, really fail to see the problem with this. We live in a world where income inequality has been growing for the past 40 years, where people in power of

I really, really fail to see the problem with this. We live in a world where income inequality has been growing for the past 40 years, where people in power of the economic institutions grow closer and close to the power of political institutions, and where the common citizen is unable to take any sort of action to voice their opinion on significant matters. Over half of the US population was in disagreement with the Iraq war, not to mention the absolute majority of its allies and the rest of the world. It is about as unanimous a disagreement on a military conflict as it gets, which ended in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. Did you forget that this woman fabricated evidence? That she openly lied to its people to get this on? There is a difference between voting for plain "political disagreement" and for considering that the person in question, in another era, would have unquestionably been tried as a war criminal. What kind of simplistic argument are you trying to bring about where all political action is equally important?