2 ms·
Ok, so it was both parties. But Condoloza Rice could have spoken out about the illegal torture and abuse. She chose not to. In fact she chose to defend it. Th
by spktrthhrts 13y ago
Ok, so it was both parties.
But Condoloza Rice could have spoken out about the illegal torture and abuse. She chose not to. In fact she chose to defend it.
That's why she is now responsible for and a symbol of warcrimes.
- wooter 13y agoCouldn't agree more! It was both parties and every last one of them should be held accountable regardless of affiliation. The votes are public knowledge! People are too quick to in-fighting over sides. Right now both are doing it and both are getting away with it. Just look at Kerry's recent syria, libya, etc. talks. I don't forgive Condosleeza a pass just like I don't give Clinton a pass for bombing Iraq. (yea, we should remember that far back!)