15 ms·
Skype TX
- dankoss 13y agoInteresting, this looks like it is intended to replace ISDN lines between studios for high quality calls.
- michaelbuckbee 13y agoThey don't list any pricing, I wonder if they provide it for free with the caveat that you have to have a Skype logo and mentions. Example, Oprah: http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/06/0604_oprah_tech_effect/3.htm http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/06/0604_oprah_tech_effe...
- selectodude 13y ago>Video and audio are free from all notifications, signals, adverts or pop-ups. I guess it depends on if you consider the Skype logo an advertisement.
- rkuykendall-com 13y agoI keep reading Skype Texas.
- riffraff 13y agoI read "skype transactions" and was awed that MSFT suddenly was a paypal competitor.
- joshu 13y agohalf.com OR, all over again.
- danvoell 13y agoSame here. Poor choice of letters to use for naming.
- nickloewen 13y ago'Tx' is the standard abbreviation for 'transmission.' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_%28telecommunications%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_%28telecommunicati...
- azth 13y agoShould have been 'Tx' then instead of 'TX' :)
- sokrates 13y agoThey probably started development after the Skype fiasco at 30C3.
- qscripter 13y agoI have a small side business providing consulting and equipment services to broadcasters using Skype/Google Hangouts/Spreecast/etc. as a cheap way to put remote interview subjects on the air. While this could be exciting depending on price, locking into Skype isn't ideal. In my experience letting the interview subject select the platform they're most comfortable with yields better results.
- MetaCosm 13y agoAs someone who listens to podcasts, this actually excites me a bit.
- fragmede 13y agoHD-SDI output? They ain't kidding around.
- phren0logy 13y ago> Using our technology, you’ll be able to interact with Skype callers across the globe – this includes experts, interviewees, audiences and even big-name stars. Wow, it even works for big-name stars! Who writes this stuff, and who are they writing it for? It's just insulting.
- untog 13y agoThey're writing it for people that aren't on Hacker News. The fact that the domain name is "media.skype.com" ought to give you a strong clue.
- phren0logy 13y ago"People who aren't on Hacker News" also includes a lot of people who understand that the technical requirements to show a talking picture of a human does not vary by notoriety.
- untog 13y agoOK, I'll be even more specific, if it helps: it's a press release. It's designed for lowest common denominator reading, they have absolutely nothing to lose by writing in such a way that every single person is able to grasp the idea of what they're selling.
- Angostura 13y agoIn this case 'Big name stars' is implying: "It's so simple and easy even people with no technical knowledge, and even those with minimal interest in making the effort to speak to you will be willing to use it". It isn't discussing the technical aspects, outside of usability. It's also suggesting that it is useful for glossy, premium-quality interviews that would usually need dedicated kit and camera crew - not just in warzones, ad hoc news interviews and vox pops. It's quite cleverly written for the target audience.
- mark212 13y agoI also read it as: "audio and video are good enough to satisfy the agents / managers / PR people for the folks who get paid a lot of money to care about how their image and voice is presented to the public."
- kayoone 13y agoThey should fix their core business. I loathe skype. Instant messaging on multiple devices is just dreadful as you get all conversations as unread again on any device you log on to skype. The mobile client sucks your battery dry and is super slow...i hate it with passion... Still i need to use it as most of my clients do..
- lsr0 13y agoWorking on it. Thanks for your feedback. (Disclaimer: Skype Engineer)
- rlu 13y agoFor what it's worth...the read/unread sync state has been fixed recently in the last few months. With that also came the ability to IM someone who is offline and have them be able to read the IM even if when they come back online, you're offline (wow!! what sort of black magic is that??)
- acd 13y agoSkype lacks a good API so that you can integrate it into your CRM, Customer support etc.
- ankuroberoi 13y agoA usable and rich API is important, but using standards to achieve interoperability is probably just as important in my eyes. The fact that Skype isn't embracing WebRTC while stating that they want to enable all these use cases is far from ideal. Lots of innovation is being done in the WebRTC API space: OpenTok (with a specific customer service API), Vline, AddLive, etc. (full disclosure: i'm a developer evangelist for TokBox, creators of OpenTok)
- liotier 13y agoSo, when is Skype RX coming ?
- shmerl 13y agoThe best contribution from Skype is freeing the Silk codec which became part of Opus (luckily it happened before MS bought them). The rest is just a proliferation of closed and non federated communication networks and protocols.
- dudus 13y agoAt first I thought it was a Chromebox for meetings [1] competitor. But they seem to have created a more enterprise product for broadcasts. I would imagine this is a very niche product. [1] https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/business/solutions/for-meetings.html?utm_source=0214cfmlaunch&utm_medium=blog https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/business/solutions/for...
- bitwize 13y agoWhoa, the Skype TX! That's got like WAY four more cylinders than the standard Skype. Better Blue Book value too!
- benwerd 13y agoThey're demoing this at NAB this week; it's a pretty stale show, filled with legacy tech, so this was one of the more interesting highlights (actual exchange with a sales engineer: "what kind of APIs do you have?" "what's an API?"). The text is definitely written for broadcast professionals.
- IvyMike 13y agoSo this is not my industry, but it's interesting to think about the requirements of a studio environment. I was recently handed a card by someone who did voiceover work, and he was "The ISDN guy" or something. I assumed that ISDN died in like 1996, but it turns out it's still considered vital for some remote voice over work. http://www.alisocreek.net/vo-articles/ISDN-for-voice-over.html http://www.alisocreek.net/vo-articles/ISDN-for-voice-over.ht...
- jmreid 13y agoPeople also use SourceConnect as a way to do studio-to-studio sessions. Works very well in the studio where I set it up. Sessions to Portland, Chicago, Germany, etc all go off without a hitch. http://source-elements.com/source-connect/ http://source-elements.com/source-connect/ You can use an ISDN bridge service to be able to talk to those studios that are still on ISDN and that works well, as well. So, this sounds like a decent thing to also have available as a service. That way clients can be on SourceConnect pure, ISDN over a bridge, or Skype TX. Skype is used currently sometimes if the talent is local but the producers are remote. Allows them to "be in the room". But Skype TX sounds like a decent solution for collaborating between studios.
- ooobo 13y agoWe're using ISDN for studio linkups in between radio stations, and for remote location -> studio connections. Would love to use Skype in it's place, major barrier is lack of fine-tuned control over gain, disabling AGC, etc. Video broadcast does seem to be the focus here, but Skype could be incredibly useful in radio broadcasting too. I think the radio industry would definitely pay for an advanced software client, especially considering so many potential guests have Skype setup at home. Having control over guests gain and more detailed metering in the client would be brilliant.
- brc 13y agoCan you educate a know-nothing what 'gain' is in this context?
- 13y ago